What is Don Roos to Nicky and Nicky to
Don Roos?
Don: Well, I think as a
filmmaker, Nicky and I are related in
that we’re very instinctive and we just
kind of hope that we’ll get it together
and that it will kind of all work out.
That is something that we do share in
common. We fly by the seat of our pants.
I’m sure I have as many cliché and
trivial ideas as Nicky the filmmaker
does. So yeah uh, probably too much in
common actually.
Jesse Bradford:
Whatever Nicky owes to Don Roos is
definitely whatever shred of likeability
he maintains I think, needs to be
credited to Don entirely. I would like
to make him even more of a scum bag and
Don reeled me in and said ‘hold on.
There are things that are good about
this person.’
Don:
The good news is that I always fall in
love with the subjects of my films
so…that is something that we have in
common. And you know, when I’m working
with an actor…they’re so open and so
vulnerable and they show you everything
they have. I usually have a “talent
crush” on people that I’m working with
and then it’s over. Lol
Obviously, you’ve worked on this piece
for awhile. There’s so many layers to
the story. It bears repeated viewing
quite easily. Please talk a bit how you
developed the style of the story and how
you layered the characters.
Don: It was so long ago that
I wrote the script. I wrote the script
three years ago. When you’re writing a
script, at least I do your very much
inside and making a lot of decisions
about the script and burying things.
There’s a whole bunch of connections
between the characters that aren’t, I
think, apparent when you see the film.
Like Nicky and Jude are very very
related. Even the Lisa Kudrow character
and Steve Coogan have one baby one way
without any thought at all compared to
the lesbians who have a child very
deliberately and very rationally. A
whole bunch of connection by the writer,
that’s myself, buried into the script.
Every story is a story about a new
generation. There’s a child in each of
those stories. There is also a theme
that each story is about characters
covering up stuff. All of which the
writer does. And honestly I forget about
that when I am shooting. It’s been a
while since I was that writer. So, I
kind of approached it very freshly. I
didn’t reread the script before we
started shooting. I relied on the actors
telling me where the characters were and
we just dealt with each at each scene. I
was hoping the writer had done his work
for now, 2 years ago. And it turned out
that he did. We basically didn’t do a
lot of analysis when shooting this
picture. We kind of went what does this
character want? What does this character
think? What is this character lying
about? Was always a kind of question for
me in each scene to identify the lies
because that tells you who each
character is? And that identifies for
the actor what their subtext is. But we
basically did what was in front of us
and trusted the writer.
There’s a lot of deception. A lot of
betrayal. Is it easier to be honest with
strangers than with the people you love?
Don: Absolutely. A writing
teacher told me a long time ago, that
the purpose of film dialogue, the
purpose of any dialogue, is to conceal
who we are rather than to reveal who we
are. Most of the things I say are to
manage your impression of things. I
think in these strangers, you’re less
invested in their opinion of you. It’s
easier to be honest. But the people
close to you, you want them to think
about you in a certain way. It’s kind of
like controlling what they know about
you.
Do you see Jesse and Jason’
characters connected as well?
Don: I saw them more as
connected then different. They both have
a secret love. Jesse’ character falls in
love with Lisa’ character; Jason’
character falls in love with Steve
Coogans character. And I found them
both, although Jesse’ character is a
little umm…able to do things that are
morally suspect. Both of them aren’t
completely honest with the people around
them. There’s innocence about them. They
don’t know a lot about the world. They
find being themselves a lot of trouble.
That it’s a hard job to be each of them.
I found them very similar in a way. But
most of them, you can say that about the
people in the film.
Jesse:
Well, it’s not something I ever thought
about before, but now that you mention
it, I think that there are some
parallels between them. And I think
there are all sorts of opposites between
them. I never thought about that before.
Don:
But there both cute. That was the thing.
My whole thing was…I don’t care who they
are but they got to be cute. Got to be
cute.
Jason:
Well, it’s really amazing to hear them
talk about it because he didn’t talk to
us about his sort of ulterior motives.
Not his ulterior motives but he didn’t
talk to us a lot about some of the
things he did. We didn’t pay attention
to as actors. We focused on making our
own character come to life and there
kind of self-centered in that way. It’s
really amazing to hear how intricate the
structure really is and I’ve seen the
move a bunch of times. And I do get
something new from it, every time.
Jason, what was your thinking for the
role? How did you prepare for that?
Jason: Well, I was just kind
of thinking what his life had been like.
That his mother had died when he was
very young and there had just been him
and his father. There’s this disconnect
there. He doesn’t feel like he can
connect with his father on many
different levels although his
relationship is so very important to
him. And I just was trying to think
about how I would have ended up if I was
in that situation. And I think you just
have to …I just sought of allowed myself
to feel out of place and uncomfortable
in my own skin as I really have.
Jesse, when you
see yourself in the 2 movies, it’s a
great testament to you as an actor. Did
you see a relationship or a contrast in
those 2 characters as well?
Jesse: I didn’t know that I
was going to have the good fortune of
having both of these movies come out at
the same time within a month of each
other. With that being the case I’m
really glad because I know what I want
to do in this business and in this art
form is try to shake it up and do as
many different things as I can. As many
different things as I’m capable of. I am
quite proud of both the projects. And
overall happy that they came out that
people like you can hold against each
other and say that’s the same guy. I’m
quite proud of the differences of one
character is subtle and trained and the
other is this total train wreck. He’s
throwing everything out there and I just
love it. Someone can theoretically can
go and see these 2 movies any day now
and kind of go what…who the hell is that
guy? So, that makes me happy.
Why did it matter to you to open the
film the way that you did? Was it just a
slap in the face to the audience?
Don: I wanted to tell the
audience what we were going to have. We
were going to have a movie that was
painful at times and also funny. Start
strictly as a comedy but obviously get
deeper. I wanted to say that this is
gonna be like life. Your gonna be happy
and surprised and you won’t know quite
where you are at every step of the game.
But there’s a storyteller here who can
actually deliver the story to you. So in
the first 4 minutes of the movie, it
kind of educates the audience into a
world. A world that they will be
spending time in. and I don’t want them
to be fighting that world. There’s a lot
of stuff that they have to accept.
Principally characters who aren’t
instantly adorable. And I wanted them to
at least understand the world that we
were in. But it was a deliberate kind of
attempt to set the story up. I do like
stories that are delivered to us by the
story teller. I do like us to be aware
that we’re being told a story. And I
think umm…that’s what the opening does.
Was it a challenge for you to deliver
such an ensemble of a cast?
Don: It’s fun because first
of all you get to work with a lot of
people. There’s not one story line that
has to deliver everything. We have
moments in this story that are very very
small. But because you have several
stories, the audience can be freshened
up. They can feel different things as
they go from story to story. It was a
pleasure to have an ensemble and
multiple story lines. It was really fun
to do.
It seems like a
trend right now. Like with the film
‘Crash’.
Don: Yeah. It’s funny that
there’s a trend. And I don’t think
there’s a lot of them. I think there’s a
few of them. It’s very hard to do it in
a mainstream Hollywood movie. They
believe in having one big star or two to
organize things for the audience. But in
the independent world, it’s very
attractive that we can tell smaller
stories and smaller parts of stories and
deliver a lot of emotional impact.
Is this why the film came in on every
story and sought of explained it? Like a
setup?
Don: Well, there were so many
characters. Yeah. And I wanted to help
the audience. You care differently about
the characters if you know something
about them secretly. If there’s a story
teller telling you that Tom Arnold is
not just a 45 year old rich man who
preys on girls. He was not that at all
in fact. He was very loyal to his wife.
His wife died. Telling you about Tom
helps Jason’ character. It gives you
subtext for the scenes that happen next.
To dramatize all that information it
would be a five hour movie. I wanted you
to feel as if you really had a
connection to these people and
understood who they were and what they
came from. You feel more. The whole
point of the film is that you feel
something about these characters.
The really cool
thing about the different stories is
that at the end they all come together.
Their storylines intertwine and it makes
sense. Can you talk a bit about that?
Don: That’s sort of how life
is. All of you have stories and we all
sort of met here. You don’t know
who…when you meet somebody, of course
you’re your own star of your own story.
Everybody is the star of their own
story. And it just seems more like life.
Life isn’t like a Hollywood movie where
there is two important people and then
there’s everybody else as a background
player. We all sought of carry our own
stories in our head.
The narration almost seems apart of
the film?
Don: The character of the
narration…the new thing for me in this
film was there is a character quality in
the narration that we don’t see in the
film. In the ‘Opposite Sex’ narration
was easily identified of course as the
Christina Ricci character. This guy
who’s talking in these subtitles is some
sought of gossipy god. It’s a different
character. And I kind of like that.
Jason and
Jesse, you both have a history of doing
ensemble films. Is there something that
attracts you to them?
Jason:
Yeah. I mean, the three things that I
think are most important are: the
character you’re going to play, the
script and the director. Those are the
things that I look at the most. If I
trust those three things, I’ll take a
bunch of unknowns. I’ll take a bunch of
big stars. I’ll take a mix of the two
but it certainly makes it even more
appealing.
Jesse:
Yeah it was intimidating but
satisfying at the same time.
What’s next for you all?
Jesse: I’m doing Clint
Eastwood’s new movie ‘Flags of Our
Fathers’. Very excited.
Jason:
I’m doing a new play at the Mitzy
New house theatre at Lincoln center.
It’s Wendy Wasserstein’s new play. It’s
called ‘Third’ in October.
Jesse:
it’s the most awesome play. I’m so happy
for him that he’s doing it.
Don:
I’m doing a load of darks and whites on
Monday. (Lol) And I’m going to redo my
pantry. So, I’m excited.
|